技术之光,引领极简主义探索。

深入探讨前沿技术栈,从底层逻辑到美学设计,我们追求每一行代码的极致精准。

expand_more
写代码的人 — Wayne Wei 的工作台

写代码的人

从 CFD 工程师到 AI Agent 架构师,我始终相信——好的技术与好的设计一样,都是在复杂中找到最简单的表达。这个博客记录我在工程实践、架构设计和效率工具上的思考。

关于我
写作的方向 — Wayne Wei 的阅读和写作

写作的方向

从底层架构到前端美学,从 AI 工程化到读书拆解——这里不追热点,只做经得起推敲的技术判断。每个系列都试图在信息过载的时代,提供一点稀缺的深度。

浏览文章

Stay curious. Keep building.

每一行代码都是一次选择。这个博客是我对这些选择的记录与反思。

浏览全部文章

Topics I Cover

menu_book 读书
emoji_objects Zero to One
rocket_launch 创业哲学
smart_toy 人工智能
code 开发
palette UI/UX
palette 设计
architecture 技术架构
language Web
build 工程实践
smart_toy AI
sync_alt 转型思考
account_tree 工程方法论

精选专题

探索深度的技术见解与行业趋势

From Zero to One to WeWork: The Boundary of the Monopoly Thesis
读书 Zero to One 创业哲学

From Zero to One to WeWork: The Boundary of the Monopoly Thesis

WeWork perfectly followed Thiel's monopoly script. It also perfectly failed. This case study maps where the monopoly thesis works — and where it becomes dangerous rhetoric.

14 min read
Thiel's Startup Philosophy: A Systematic Critique
读书 Zero to One 创业哲学

Thiel's Startup Philosophy: A Systematic Critique

A comprehensive 6000-word critical analysis of Peter Thiel's Zero to One — acknowledging real insights while exposing survivorship bias, reverse causality, and the WeWork problem.

Verdict #7: The Founder's Paradox — The Most Dangerous Idea in Zero to One
读书 Zero to One 创业哲学

Verdict #7: The Founder's Paradox — The Most Dangerous Idea in Zero to One

Thiel romanticizes extreme founder traits as necessary for success. But history shows the same traits produce Neumann, Holmes, and SBF with equal probability. Selection bias at its most dangerous. Evidence strength: 2/5.

Verdict #6: Man + Machine — Right in 2014, Outrun by 2026
读书 Zero to One 创业哲学

Verdict #6: Man + Machine — Right in 2014, Outrun by 2026

Thiel's claim that computers complement rather than replace humans was a sharp insight in 2014. A decade of AI progress has narrowed its validity range significantly. Evidence strength: 3/5.

Verdict #5: Secrets — Right Direction, Dangerous Absence of Verification
读书 Zero to One 创业哲学

Verdict #5: Secrets — Right Direction, Dangerous Absence of Verification

Thiel's claim that important secrets remain undiscovered is directionally right. But his framework provides no way to distinguish genuine insight from delusion — making it vulnerable to abuse. Evidence strength: 2/5.

Verdict #4: The Power Law — Descriptive Truth, Prescriptive Trap
读书 Zero to One 创业哲学

Verdict #4: The Power Law — Descriptive Truth, Prescriptive Trap

Thiel's claim that power law distributions dominate venture returns is empirically solid. But extending it into a universal 'go all-in' prescription for founders is dangerously simplistic. Evidence strength: 3/5.

Verdict #3: Definite Optimism — Why Thiel's Cultural Diagnosis Misses the Mark
读书 Zero to One 创业哲学

Verdict #3: Definite Optimism — Why Thiel's Cultural Diagnosis Misses the Mark

Thiel's four-worldview model is a provocative cultural lens. But his claim that America's shift from definite to indefinite optimism caused stagnation grossly underestimates the IT revolution. Evidence strength: 2/5.

Verdict #2: The Last Mover Advantage & Seven Questions Framework
读书 Zero to One 创业哲学

Verdict #2: The Last Mover Advantage & Seven Questions Framework

Thiel's seven questions are a decent checklist, but oversold as a prediction tool. The last mover advantage is real — but only under specific market conditions. Evidence strength: 3/5.

用了两个月 AI 写代码,我还没被取代
人工智能 开发

用了两个月 AI 写代码,我还没被取代

2026 年 4 月开始学用 AI 写代码。两个月了,还活着。

我的博客为什么只有三个导航链接
UI/UX 设计

我的博客为什么只有三个导航链接

因为做复杂了我也维护不了。

Verdict #1: Monopoly Success Theory — Why Peter Thiel Got It 40% Right
读书 Zero to One 创业哲学

Verdict #1: Monopoly Success Theory — Why Peter Thiel Got It 40% Right

Thiel's core claim — 'all successful companies are monopolies, competition is for losers' — is the logical foundation of Zero to One. But it suffers from survivorship bias and reverse causality. Evidence strength: 2/5.

一个初学者的架构教训
技术架构 Web

一个初学者的架构教训

刚学写代码就想搞微服务——我踩过最蠢的坑。

写代码两个月,我踩过最深的坑
工程实践 开发

写代码两个月,我踩过最深的坑

一个刚学写代码的人犯过的错,可能比老手一年犯的还多。

从算风的到写代码的:为什么 CFD 工程师是天然的 AI Agent 架构师?
AI 转型思考 工程方法论

从算风的到写代码的:为什么 CFD 工程师是天然的 AI Agent 架构师?

做了十年 CFD,2026 年 4 月才开始学 AI。两个月后我发现自己十年积累的工程直觉——残差监控、边界条件、迭代收敛——全都能平移过来。这不是巧合,是底层思维的同构。

mail

订阅每周技术周刊

获取关于 Web 开发、架构设计和效率工具的最新见解,直接发送到您的收件箱。